Petra Marcinko vs Lina Gjorcheska Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Jul at 04:52 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Marcinko vs L. Gjorcheska

CRO
1
Win
Played
2
Win

MKD
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Marcinko 1 - 2 Gjorcheska
They have played 7 sets in total, with Petra Marcinko winning 3 and Lina Gjorcheska winning 4. The last match between Petra Marcinko and Lina Gjorcheska was at the ATV Bancomat Tennis Open - Rome, 16-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Petra Marcinko getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marcinko | 1 |
| Gjorcheska | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) ATV Bancomat Tennis Open - Rome(07-16-25)
(R1) W75 Maribor(03-19-25)
(SF) W75 Rome(07-13-24)
P. Marcinko vs L. Gjorcheska H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $283,670 | Career Prize Money | $33,613 |
| 66.23% (151-77) | Career Total W/L | 63.91% (494-279) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 10 | Titles | 15 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 100.00% (4-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Marcinko vs L. Gjorcheska Match Preview:
- Marcinko has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 38.31% compared to Gjorcheska's 35.78% over the last 6 months. What could this suggest for when second serves become crucial? It could favor Marcinko.
- In terms of return game strength, Gjorcheska has been more effective, winning 55.78% of second serve returns, while Marcinko has claimed 51.55%. Could this indicate a potential advantage for Gjorcheska during return games? Yes, it might.
- When facing high-pressure moments like breakpoints, Gjorcheska narrowly excels, having saved 47.27% compared to Marcinko's 45.77%.
- Overall match success rate in the past year favors Marcinko who boasts a 64.18% win rate, while Gjorcheska stands at a 53.85% win rate. Could Marcinko's more consistent year give them a competitive edge?
- Marcinko performs best on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Gjorcheska thrives on clay, also with 67% wins. Both struggle on grass.
- Both competitors have largely played in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, yet Marcinko has a higher success rate with 63.33% wins over Gjorcheska's 54.9%.
- Head-to-head encounters have resulted in Gjorcheska defeating Marcinko 2 out of 2 times. What could this streak mean for their upcoming match? It presents Gjorcheska as a solid performer against Marcinko.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, historically Marcinko performs better, winning 53% of such sets compared to Gjorcheska's 41%.
- Marcinko faces tougher opponents on average, with an average rank of 269.7, in contrast to Gjorcheska's 333.02.
- Marcinko is slightly more proficient in converting breakpoints, with a conversion rate of 44.27% compared to Gjorcheska's 40.77%.
Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):
Marcinko and Gjorcheska present distinct playing styles and stat profiles, displaying both strengths and areas for potential improvement.
While Marcinko has displayed more consistent performance in overall matches and against higher-ranked opponents, Gjorcheska's head-to-head triumphs suggest a psychological edge.
The deciding set history works slightly in Marcinko's favor, but Gjorcheska's stronger return game could shift momentum at critical junctures.
This encounter will likely be closely contested, with both players having clear routes to victory.
Based on the comprehensive analysis of their recent stats and past encounters, Gjorcheska holds a subtle advantage, making her the favored candidate for winning the upcoming match.
Petra Marcinko vs Lina Gjorcheska Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Marcinko vs L. Gjorcheska H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 30 | Games Won | 35 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 23 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1:29:51 | Average Match Time | 1:29:51 |
| 59% (132/222) | 1st Serve % | 66% (138/208) |
| 58% (77/132) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (88/138) |
| 37% (33/90) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (24/70) |
| 48% (13/27) | Break Pts Won % | 46% (16/35) |
| 46% (96/208) | Return Points Win % | 50% (112/222) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Marcinko Recent Matches Played
L. Gjorcheska Recent Matches Played

P. Marcinko vs L. Gjorcheska Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.23% (151/77) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.91% (494/279) |
| 63.99% (327/184) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.59% (1097/684) |
| 55.95% (2566/2020) | Games Win/Loss | 55.17% (8820/7167) |
| 65.28% (47/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.14% (56/42) |
| 67.80% (80/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.95% (393/194) |
| 66.67% (24/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.33% (45/41) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 374 | Aces Total | 1043 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 624 | Total Double Faults | 2132 |
| 1:24:18 | Average Match Time | 1:2:26 |
| 351.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 537.8 |
| 60% (8369/14010) | 1st Serve % | 64% (22132/34476) |
| 64% (5365/8369) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (13845/22132) |
| 47% (2625/5641) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5363/12343) |
| 50% (952/1907) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2394/4754) |
| 48% (6710/13996) | Return Points Win % | 48% (16730/34748) |
| 40.00% (6/9) | Slam W/L | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 76.92% (10/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 68.54% (122/56) | Challenger W/L | 61.52% (283/177) |
| 68.75% (11/5) | Futures W/L | 69.97% (205/88) |
| 67% (149/222) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (488/761) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 61% (28/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (78/141) |
| 58% (34/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (125/233) |
| 90% (155/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (480/416) |
| 10% (155/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (480/64) |
| 16% (73/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (293/78) |